Kinas annektering af Tibet

Folkerepublikken Kinas annektering af Tibet i oktober 1950 (også kaldt "kinesisk invasion af Tibet" af den tibetanske regering i eksil^[1], og "fredelig befrielse af Tibet" i Kina^[2]^[3]^[4]). Det var processen, hvorved Folkerepublikken Kina fik kontrol over Tibet, efter forsøg på at få international anerkendelse, forsøg på at modernisere sit militære, forhandlinger mellem Tibet og Kina, en militær konflikt i Qamdo-området i det vestlige Kham i oktober 1950, og den endelige accept af syttenpunktsoverenskomsten af Tibets regering under kinesisk pres i oktober 1951.^[5]^[6] I Vesten er den generelle opfattelse, at Kina annekterede Tibet.^[7] Den tibetanske regering og den tibetanske sociale struktur forblev på plads i den tibetanske selvstyrende region under Kinas myndighed indtil den tibetanske opstand i 1959, da Dalai Lama flygtede til eksil, hvorefter de gamle tibetanske samfundsstrukturer blev opløst.^[8]

^ "China could not succeed in destroying Buddhism in Tibet: Sangay". Central Tibetan Administration. Arkiveret fra originalen 21. september 2018. Hentet 30. november 2018.
^ "Peaceful Liberation of Tibet". Xinhua News Agency.
^ Dawa Norbu (2001). China's Tibet Policy. Psychology Press. s. 300-301. ISBN 978-0-7007-0474-3.
^ Melvyn C. Goldstein; Gelek Rimpoche (1989). A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State. University of California Press. s. 679, 740. ISBN 978-0-520-06140-8.
^ Anne-Marie Blondeau; Katia Buffetrille (2008). Authenticating Tibet: Answers to China's 100 Questions. University of California Press. s. 61. ISBN 978-0-520-24464-1. It was evident that the Chinese were not prepared to accept any compromises and that the Tibetans were compelled, under the threat of immediate armed invasion, to sign the Chinese proposal.
^ Tsepon Wangchuk Deden Shakabpa (oktober 2009). One Hundred Thousand Moons: An Advanced Political History of Tibet. BRILL. s. 953, 955. ISBN 90-04-17732-9.
^ "Tibet Through Chinese Eyes", The Atlantic, 1999
^ Goldstein 1997 p.54,55. Feigon 1996 p.160,161. Shakya 1999 p.208,240,241. (all sources: fled Tibet, repudiated agreement, dissolved local government).

[1] "China could not succeed in destroying Buddhism in Tibet: Sangay". Central Tibetan Administration. Arkiveret fra originalen 21. september 2018. Hentet 30. november 2018.

[2] "Peaceful Liberation of Tibet". Xinhua News Agency.

[Norbu2001-3] Dawa Norbu (2001). China's Tibet Policy. Psychology Press. s. 300-301. ISBN 978-0-7007-0474-3.

[GoldsteinRimpoche1989-4] Melvyn C. Goldstein; Gelek Rimpoche (1989). A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State. University of California Press. s. 679, 740. ISBN 978-0-520-06140-8.

[5] Anne-Marie Blondeau; Katia Buffetrille (2008). Authenticating Tibet: Answers to China's 100 Questions. University of California Press. s. 61. ISBN 978-0-520-24464-1. It was evident that the Chinese were not prepared to accept any compromises and that the Tibetans were compelled, under the threat of immediate armed invasion, to sign the Chinese proposal.

[6] Tsepon Wangchuk Deden Shakabpa (oktober 2009). One Hundred Thousand Moons: An Advanced Political History of Tibet. BRILL. s. 953, 955. ISBN 90-04-17732-9.

[7] "Tibet Through Chinese Eyes", The Atlantic, 1999

[autogenerated54-8] Goldstein 1997 p.54,55. Feigon 1996 p.160,161. Shakya 1999 p.208,240,241. (all sources: fled Tibet, repudiated agreement, dissolved local government).

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]